On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Pascal Bleser wrote: > Beman Dawes wrote: > > At 10:04 AM 8/4/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > > >Pascal Bleser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> aCC tells me that it's the same function... yuck... > > >> Agreed, it's a sick compiler > > >You've hit the nail on the head. > > >> , but nevertheless... > > >> I will try once more using STLport, but it's not about the STL IMHO. > > >My advice? Don't waste your time. Use GCC or some non-sick compiler > > >for your platform, or, sadly, give up on Boost until HP gets their > > >act together. > > Dave's 100% right, AFAIC. > > Well, if things were that simple, we would have used GCC 2.x/3.x on HP-UX as well. > Unfortunately, we have to link against 3rd party C++ libraries (Tuxedo (CORBA), > actually) that have > been compiled with aCC (*gasp* even with the old roguewave STL - they don't even > have the std > namespace).
Since CORBA provides IIOP interoperability, I would suggest to use some different implementation in apps, where you would like to use boost+gcc instead of Tuxedo. Any problem with using free impls like: MICO (http://www.mico.org), omniORB (http://www.omniorb-support.com), TAO (http://www.theaceorb.com)? > This gets a little off-topic, but has anybody had any success linking together > objects that have > been compiled with g++ and aCC on HP-UX ? I'm afaraid name mangling is different... Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
