Brian McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't speak for bind/lambda, although I imagine there must be a way, > probably involving delaying the evaluation of _1 for one step. > > Using FC++, it would be > > using fcpp::fun1; > using fcpp::lambda; > using fcpp::ptr_to_fun; > fun1<user_message,void> f = > lambda(X)[ ptr_to_fun(post_command)[ > lambda()[ ptr_to_fun(show_warning)[ message_dialog(), X ] > ] ] ]; > > The explicit lambda notation makes it easier to (mentally and > syntactically) sort out functions like these where the placeholder > variables are bound by a lambda (bind expression) other than the > innermost one. > > (The calls to to ptr_to_fun above are necessary only to promote the > function pointers into FC++ "functoids".)
Damn, that's nice looking code! -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
