>Beman Dawes wrote: >> Assuming I'm release manager for 1.31.0, I'm going to publish explicit >> release criteria for key platform/compiler pairs. Basically, the >> criteria will be 100% accounting for all failures on those >> platform/compiler pairs. > >While I totally support the failures markup goal, I would like to see >_the_ release criteria to include "no regressions from the previous >release" item as well, preferrably for all non-beta compilers that are >currently under regression testing. Especially since now we have tools >to ensure it.
That sounds reasonable to me.
>Especially since now we have tools to ensure it.
Damn. I forgot to bookmark the URL. Could you post it again please? Or better yet add something to boost-root/status/compiler_status.html linking to the permanent location. That in turn means deciding what of your experiment work is permanent and where it will live.
Thanks,
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
