>-----Original Message----- >From: Brian McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:29:49AM +0200, Hartmut Kaiser wrote: > You've done a great piece of code! I've tried to understand your > articles about the differences between fcpp and boost::lambda/bind/etc. > and these (the differences) are now clear to me (to some degree :-). > > OTOH I know, that there is going on serious work to merge boost::lambda > with Phoenix to overcome some well known limitations of both and to > avoid having two similar libraries in boost. Wouldn't it be nice, if > after this merger we'd get _one_ library lambda + phoenix + fcpp? Or > isn't this possible at all? >It may well be possible. But should it be done? Or only some sort of interoperability with shared components? >This begs another important (at least to me :) ) question about FC++ and >Boost. Can FC++ be accepted into Boost prior to any "integration" with >lambda/phoenix/bind? Sure! boost isn't the standards committee, its about having great tools. Just because we have standard screw drivers doesn't mean we can't have torix, phillips and robertson. (all different head types.) -Gary- _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
