On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:11:09 +0200, David Abrahams wrote: > David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> I checked in a fix for checked_delete.hpp for the Metrowerks CW8 to >>> CVS HEAD. It was created in cooperation with Howard and I'm positiv >>> that it's a good one-size-fits-all solution. I don't know about your >>> shedule for 1.30.2, but you might want to consider merging it to >>> RC_1_30_0. I will not push this as I don't want to delay 1.30.2, >>> having it in 1.31.0 is fine, too. >> >> Hmm, I use Pro8.3 all the time and have never seen a need for a patch >> to checked_delete. Ah, the regressions were in expected-failure tests?
The regression depends on the compiler flags. It occurs with "-iso_templates on" which - according to Howard - is a good idea to use. Personally, I have no clue what it's good for... :) > OK, I like your patch and I've applied it in the branch. I'm going to > release tomorrow morning after the meta-comm regressions have run again. Thanks. I'll keep my fingers crossed... Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
