On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:28:57 +1000 "Chris Trengove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I don't think the it is technically a union because the result draws > > in points in the time period that aren't part of either of the > > initial > periods. > > Anyway I wrote the code as merge_inclusive so unless you have a > > major objection I'll leave it that way pending a better idea... > > Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think > merge_inclusive is fine. How about "maximize" or "maximize_duration" or just "max" or "max_duration"? -- Jeremy B. Maitin-Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
