Hello boosters, Since I see strong activities in overworking parts of the documentation, I would like to remember the open question concerning the help text section "Separate, Explicit Instantiation"
http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/operators.htm#explicit_instantiation During the summer pause I discussed some problems concerning this usage of the operator class templates without inheritance (I.e. without CRTP) in the thread "Non-standard feature proposed in help text of operators library??" with Daniel Frey and David Abrahams. Although my original critic was not well-explained on my side and resulted in some misunderstandings among the "discussees" I think, that we can be assume, that the current text proposes a non-standard feature and should be either removed or declared as "non-portable". If you don't think that this statement holds true, please clarify why. Thanks, Daniel Spangenberg _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
