Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed >> > for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to >> > the supplier of the compiler (i.e. redhat). >> >> I am noticing a theme in your postings today: you seem remarkably >> unsympathetic to anyone who hasn't made what you consider to be the >> "right" choice of software systems. At Boost we *generally* try not >> to hold these kinds of missteps against our users, because we're more >> interested in seeing our software widely used than in avoiding the >> hassles of platform dependencies; I don't think you're going to change >> that culture with a few postings (at least I hope not)! > > You're right. I must have had a bad day, I apologise, hope you are > open enough to accept it. I've been out running now, that often helps :-)
No need to apologize - you're entitled to your opinion, but I (we) accept anyway. I just wanted to let you know that other people may have different priorities. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
