> BTW, after looking at the implementation I was a bit disappointed to > see two copies of the storage. It seems to nullify one > important reason for using variants (space savings), and it generates > more code than a single-storage version. I know you had some rationale for > that but I don't remember what it is; I hope it's in the docs along > with some explanation of the expected size of the resulting object. > > Regards, > Dave
Double storage is needed to ensure strong guaraty for variant. I argued need for it before and I still believe we not nesseserily need to do that (I remember your post on the topic, that strong guaranty is a "incorrect" goal to pursue for the variant). Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
