Gregory Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * use the standard parameterization mechanisms (Allocator) when > choosing to parameterize
I'm not sure about this one. std::allocator are a mess, and almost everyone knows it. They were designed for containers, and they only barely work there, IMO. Remember the weasel-wording about unequal allocators and the assumptions implementations are allowed to make about allocator's nested types? I really don't want to be in the position of forcing library authors to match users' expectations about the way their particular implementation's allocators work. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
