"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> "Eric Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >   std::set< my_variant, boost::variant_less<my_variant> >
>
> I had the same thought myself, though I'd be inclined to spend a
> little time searching for a better name than "less", since it doesn't
> really mean that.  Maybe "variant_before", using type_info::before as
> a precedent?

Maybe std::less<T> is a precedent too?
Nearly everyone I know has written a small, little wrapper around
type_info to make it useable in the associative containers (and
the default std::less<T>).

Dirk



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to