Eric Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dave Gomboc wrote: > [snip] > > I don't like get() because I cannot write x.get() when x is a POD. This > > would mean I have to support nilable<T> and T with different code, > > which is exactly what I'm trying to avoid. > > Why not overload boost::get again for optional? This would certainly improve > consistency with variant. For instance: > This was my intention from the very beginning. I was just waiting for variant<> to be out there.
> > In the same line, we could make optional visitable: > And so about this. Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
