On Monday 01 September 2003 07:53 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> I'm asking for voting for the new name of dynamic_any. Please, give you
> preference.
> Here is my discussion about the name with Kevlin Henney (>> and empty
> prefix - Kevlin, > - me)
Between the two: adaptable_any is better, I think.
Because I like throwing wrenches: have you considered a very different name
such as "polymorphic" or just "poly". The idea is that we read:
poly<less_than_comparable, equality_comparable>
as "a type that is polymorphic over all less_than_comparable &
equality_comparable types."
And because I'm feeling silly and reading a book on lattice theory... it could
also be named models_meet, as in "a type that models the meet of the
following concepts in the concept lattice".
Doug
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
