On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:50:09 -0400, David Abrahams wrote > I'm just getting started with the date_time library, and I think I'm > gonna like it.
Let's hope so! > I have some quibbles with the naming choices though > (shocking! me of all people!) For example, why is the nested > namespace called posix_time instead of, simply, posix? Once you're Seemed clearer to me that it would be limited to time and not presume to encompass all of posix. > in a date_time context it seems to me that _time adds nothing. > Similarly, what's the "p" in ptime stand for? I can guess, but I > can guess it's also redundant ;-) My first choice was 'time'. However, as I recall I ran into some nasty macros that interfered with that name, sigh. time_point would be another possibility, but it is longer. I'm certainly open to suggestions... Jeff _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
