| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Abrahams | Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:08 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [boost] Re: [date_time] time_duration | |> | > Yikes! They probably all should be plural. Problem is the abbreviated | > 'millisecs' doesn't sound right to me, so perhaps that's the reason.... | | Well, abbrevs just don't sound right. Bite the bullet and use the | full names, please!
Yes - millseconds, microsconds, nanoseconds ... please. And time_point shounds VERY MUCH better to me (than ptime or time). And I suggest first_day_of_week_after first_day_of_week_before last_day_of_week_in_month first_day_of_week_in_month so first_day_of_week_after my_date(Monday); will now make sense to almost any reader. "Boost has always favoured clarity over curtness" Paul PS Isn't time from C time in global namespace? Not a macro but still a PITA! PPS It would be great if Jeff could find the time to produce version 2. There is so much that seems right to me. Forget about MSVC 6 and gcc 2.x and break out! Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
