On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 15:27:24 -0400, David Abrahams wrote > This is causing an ambiguity: > > using namespace boost::date_time; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Right, you don't need the line above.
> using namespace boost::posix_time; > time_duration since_1970 = d - 1/Jan/1970; ^^^^^^ joel's extension I presume? > The error was: > ... detail omitted... > > Is it really right for us to have two time_durations? I never > expected this since boost::date_time::time_duration is nowhere > documented. The way to think of namespace date_time is 'detail' for now. I expect to document it more fully in the future. Jeff _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost