Michael,
Thanks. I wondered who was doing all those good anonymous comments. It is better now. Jon From: Michael Blome <michael.bl...@microsoft.com> Date: Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:31 AM To: Jon Kalb <j...@cppcon.org>, Gordon Hogenson <gho...@microsoft.com> Cc: CppCon Planning List <p...@cppcon.org>, BoostCon Planning Committee <boostcon-plan@googlegroups.com> Subject: RE: Tagging Guide Looks good to me. I think it conveys the idea well. I made an edit pass for typos (as anonymous) and left a couple of comments. Looks like you already dealt with my previous edits but there are a few additional ones I just made. From: Jon Kalb [mailto:j...@cppcon.org] Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2017 4:39 PM To: Gordon Hogenson <gho...@microsoft.com>; Michael Blome <michael.bl...@microsoft.com> Cc: CppCon Planning List <p...@cppcon.org>; BoostCon Planning Committee <boostcon-plan@googlegroups.com> Subject: Tagging Guide Gordon, Michael, I’ve created a document to document the rationale for how and why sessions should be tagged: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G7sfc-jkdeGRZqO4lT4FiTYNKVgtzLZyALtWXKiGRPw/edit# Can you please review the doc, both for typos/clarity of the doc, but also for content as it applies to tags. Does the set of rules outlines for the style guide make sense? Do you see errors or contradictions? Thanks. Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "boostcon-plan" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to boostcon-plan+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
