Daniel On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 14:06 Daniel Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 01:16:08PM +0100, David Rusling wrote: > > [4] There's not yet a standard 64 bit aarch64 release of Debian buster > > (9). That's terrible progress. I managed to build my own but not > > without a lot of faffing about. > > Is the real problem: > > a) That there is no AArch64 Debian buster rootfs image. > > b) That the existing AArch64 Debian buster *installer* images doesn't > boot out of the box. > > Personally my own answer has always been b) and, to be honest, that's > what got me interested in EBBR in the first place. EBBR (admitedly > coupled with upstreamed hardware enablement for both bootloader and > kernel) gets us much closer to that. > > > I could only find a buster image via h https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi3ttps://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi3 and that didn't work out of the box for RPi 3b+. I'll chat with Steve et al and see what's missing / happening. > > [5] Yocto / OE does not build natively arm on arm (as well as taking a > very > > long time on a RPi 3) > > Is this the "how to bootstrap go without using the host go compiler" > problem or something else? > > The problem appears to be not cross building as I see 'internal' issues. I'll build on x86 and see where the differences are, but I suspect that this is an arm-on-arm problem. > > > I should take my notes and write this 'folklore' up, but it is a mess > > compared to pretty much any Intel board. The shame is that the Raspberry > > Pi is probably the best supported aarch64 device that there is... > > Must... resist... commenting... > > Well done David > > Daniel. > > -- David A Rusling CTO, Linaro https://linaro.org _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
