On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 00:34, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 06:14:16PM -0400, Francois Ozog wrote: > > Le mar. 4 juin 2019 à 17:31, Tom Rini <[email protected]> a écrit : > > ... > > I think it may be good to validate but not provide. There is no Linux > > provided ACPI table right ? So I get the point to validate a DT. > > There's "Linux provided" ACPI tables when someone has to decompile, > fixup and re-compile their DSDT files. > > Or perhaps a better way to think of it is that yes, there's "Linux > provided ACPI tables" when vendors are developing their hardware and > correcting their ACPI tables. Same thing with DT, by and large (as > overlays and secure boot are a can of worms to worry about later).
Secure boot enabled Linux does not permit this model. Side loading of DSDTs/SSDTs is disabled by the hardening patchset that all the distros carry for secure boot enabled kernels. _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
