Minor comment:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 17:02:27 +0100, Francois Ozog wrote:
> 0.2 - normative text
> The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding
> Principles" normative?
>
> IETF and ETSI have different language conventions to express
> absolutely mandated and various levels of optionality. This spec may
> be red by Telecom people or Linux people. Their interpretation may be
> erroneous on words such as "shall" (ETSI "SHALL" = "IETF "MUST"). The
IETF "SHALL" is a synonym for IETF "MUST" (whereas IETF bans use of
"MUST").
> language need to be explicit.
It is important to stick to a clearly identified set of definitions,
but this particular case is not conflicting.
/
Leif
https://portal.etsi.org/Portals/0/TBpages/edithelp/Docs/AGuideToWritingWorldClassStandards.pdf?ver=2014-05-19-124137-453
vs.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
