On 10/03/2020 22:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 3/10/20 9:45 PM, Francois Ozog wrote:
Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 21:15, Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> a
0.2 - normative text
The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding
Principles" normative?
IETF and ETSI have different language conventions to express
absolutely mandated and various levels of optionality. This spec may
be red by Telecom people or Linux people. Their interpretation may be
erroneous on words such as "shall" (ETSI "SHALL" = "IETF "MUST"). The
language need to be explicit.
A reference to RFC 2119 should be added to the EBBR.
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/issues/46
g.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
