On 18.02.21 10:04, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An arch agnostic way was recently added on the kernel, as an alternative 
> method
> to load an initrd [1].  The kernel call to the firmware ends up calling the
> protocol with a Device Path End Structure, so the firmware must know which
> initrd to load on the buffer the kernel provides.
>
> The protocol is currently implemented by U-boot and EDK2, which both
> define a way of specifying the initrd to load.  We could use this protocol,
> in order to provide vertical distros a way of loading (kernel, initrd) pairs
> without GRUB.  In that case we need a common way for firmware implementations
> to define and manage the initrd.  User space applications that control the 
> boot
> flow (e.g efibootmgr), should also be able to change the variable accordingly.
>
> Looking at the EFI spec and specifically § 3.1.3 Load Options, we can use the
> FilePathList[] of the EFI_LOAD_OPTION, which is described as:
>
> "A packed array of UEFI device paths. The first element of the array is a
> device path that describes the device and location of the Image for this
> load option. The FilePathList[0] is specific to the device type. Other device
> paths may optionally exist in the FilePathList, but their usage is OSV 
> specific.
> Each element in the array is variable length, and ends at the device path end
> structure. Because the size of Description is arbitrary, this data structure
> is not guaranteed to be aligned on a natural boundary. This data structure may
> have to be copied to an aligned natural boundary before it is used."
>
> So FilePatrhList[1-n] are available for OS usage.  There are 3 ways we could
> implement that. All 3 ways would allow us to specify multiple initrds (and we
> could extend the same logic to DTBs, but that's a different discussion).
> They all re-use the same idea,  prepend a VenMedia DP, which has a GUID. We 
> can
> then use that GUID to identify the filetype and behavior of the device paths.
>
> 1. Prepend a VenMedia Device Path in every initrd Device Path. In that case
> FilePathList[] would look like this:
>
> Loaded Image device path - end node - VenMedia - Initrd DP - end node
> - VenMedia - Initrd DP - end node - repeat
>
> 2. Prepend a VenMedia Device Path once. In that case FilePathList[] would look
> like this:
>
> Loaded Image device path - end node - VenMedia - Initrd DP - end
> instance - (repeat) - Initrd DP - end node - other DPs
>
> In this case we could use the VenMedia Vendor Defined Data to indicate
> the number
> of device paths that follow, although it's redundant, since each instance 
> would
> terminate on the Device Path End Structure.
>
> 3. Use Vendor Defined Data of the VenMedia device path and copy the initrd
> device path(s) in there. In that case the Vendor Defined Data will it self
> be in a device path format with all the initrds we want.
>
> Loaded Image device path - end node - VenMedia - end node - other DPs

When passing the device path of the boot option to the EDK2
implementation of
EFI_DEVICE_PATH_TO_TEXT_PROTOCOL.ConvertDevicePathToText(), it will
print out all array elements as comma separated list like

HD(1,GPT,..,0x2000,0x200000)/File(\EFI\debian\shimaa64.efi),/VenMedia(00000001-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)/HD(2,GPT,..,0x2000,0x200000)/File(\initrd1),/VenMedia(00000001-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)/HD(2,GPT,..,0x2000,0x200000)/File(\initrd2)

The device path end nodes of sub-type 0x01 are rendered as commas.

With 1 and 2 this would show a readable output like above.
With 3 you will just see a hex-string.

This excludes 3 for me.

If 2 does not add the number of initrds, it cannot be determined if a
following array element starting with a VenMedia() node is an initrd or
has a completely different meaning.

With 1 you can individually determine for each element its meaning by
looking at the first node.

Therefore I prefer 1.

Best regards

Heinrich

>
>
> Any preference on these?
> Is one of them closer to the EFI spec, so we could go ahead and try to
> standardize some of the GUIDs of the VenMedia?
>
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/16/105
>
> Regards
> /Ilias
>

_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture

Reply via email to