On 3/9/09 5:06 PM, Jack Moffitt wrote: >> During the Applications Area Open Meeting on Monday at 09:00, there will >> also be a discussion about bidirectional HTTP techniques such as BOSH, >> Comet/Bayeux, and WebSockets (for the purpose of cross-pollination and >> also to help the IETF figure out if they want to standardize something >> in this space). > > Great! It's about time such cross pollination happened.
Indeed. >> I'm working to convince a variety of different people to >> give brief presentations about each of those technologies at the AppArea >> meeting, and I think it would be great for someone other than me to talk >> about BOSH. The ideal candidate would be technologically sophisticated, >> know a lot about BOSH (both spec and implementation), and be considered >> a thought leader in the XMPP community. Jack, what do you think? ;-) > > I'd be happy to oblige. Do you know about how long the presentation > should be? Brief -- probably we'll spend 5 minutes on BOSH, 5 minutes on Bayeux, 5 minutes on WebSockets (still looking for someone to give a presentation about that), and 15 minutes to compare the three and talk about whether the IETF wants to get involved in this space. > I can try and draft an outline and see what everyone > thinks here on the BOSH list. Off the top of my head interesting > things that are still unsolved: > > * verification of certificates (we discussed this some in regards to > the secure attribute) > * cross domain issues (single origin policy is quite annoying) > > Does anyone else have any big issues that should be brought up? I think we want to provide a very clear overview of what BOSH is, where it is implemented and deployed, how it is used, etc., plus the kind of open issues you mention here. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
