On 5/13/11 2:20 PM, Matthew A. Miller wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 13:02 , Glenn Maynard wrote: > >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Matthew A. Miller >> <[email protected]> wrote: Yes, "service domain" == >> "domainpart" in this context. This the general consensus for all >> XMPP authentication. >> >> Is there anywhere these general consensuses are documented? As an >> implementor, it's painful having to wade through mailing lists >> trying to figure out these things that aren't fully specced, and as >> a user it's hard to report bugs when there's nowhere authorative >> (much less normative) to point to in bug reports. >> > > This used to be sort of documented in a "Tao of XMPP" wiki site, that > I can't find again. /sigh
You mean XEP-0134: XMPP Design Guidelines? http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0134.html If this needs to be clarified somewhere (perhaps even RFC 6120), do let me know. :) /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
