-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:09, Jack Moffitt wrote: >> But I think it reflects the previous topics of discussion; I could not >> immediately think of any others. > > I can :) > > The main one I discovered recently is in the response caching. There > are cases outside what is stated in the spec where the response should > be cached. See: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/strophe/D3Nj_I2OvaM/VeoDvvHd-hMJ > > Basically it seems that if no response is yet generated, you shouldn't > throw out a re-request of the same RID, as there are cases where this > is the logical thing to do. > I'll add it to the issues list. > It would also be very nice to formalize session attachment somehow, > but this is probably best done in a new XEP. I agree session attachment probably ought to be a new XEP. - - m&m Matthew A. Miller <http://goo.gl/LK55L> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQIqD/AAoJEJq6Ou0cgrSP6ukH/j4NMzAvpc0h21ypjLQCzvmJ s95t7+yuXdWgyTanoHdIXDt/GAGuUnUZSumVST3GjG+wPMYPUbWE1nKXw1JSKUbh 50oj4AVuNafDIrM44X1e11E9hty85YKNzKelsPeZ9v02voejpeCmMvsVllZf8a5Z FIU+7AodNOFV9EQAND+SlK+yJSRotZDJYC2mcvlcKLgtg0ew4Nxx8D23YvAsjQEX ygTpSHzEqX15HcjdFFD8tBYK+imeUVn6NHbkQlL47BxXwU7V7MeCEL1NV08ji5If W0krbaHvXag59oX0ZGd6I62Ap9VgXDpxVs794u0AonlbjdsNleutfGmb8H9cbAY= =zG1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
