On 28 November 2012 16:22, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 27 November 2012 12:59, Pranav N. Wangikar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I am not sure whether Gloox xmpp library since its not mentioned on feature >> list >> http://camaya.net/gloox/features >> Does Gloox xmpp-library supports BOSH(XEP0124) extensions? >> Really appreciate any response on this. > > Yes, I implemented BOSH in Gloox in 2007 as a Summer of Code project. > I used it myself for some projects but am no longer involved in Gloox > development (which in fact is slow/non-existent right now), nor am I > actively using Gloox myself nowadays, so my memory is vague about > details of its use. > > Documentation is available though: > http://camaya.net/api/gloox/classgloox_1_1ConnectionBOSH.html
Oh, I should mention that one thing that came to my attention recently was that Gloox may not support HTTPS proxies with BOSH (see recent thread http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/2012-November/089250.html ). If you're not bound to gloox, Swiften is an alternative C++ library under active development, and also supports BOSH: http://swift.im/swiften/ Good luck, Matthew
