Sean Quinlan wrote: > > From: Greg London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ... > Greg, did this ever get answered? nope, I filed a perlbug, and I figured out a workaround. the perlbug people are debating it, and I'm letting them figure it out what they want to do. > At least that's my guess. However, that might not be the end of this. Look into > the @- and @+ arrays, which I think (no docs handy) will do what your looking > for. hm, I couldn't find @- or @+ in the second edition of Programming Perl. when you get some docs handy, could you point me to a specific source? Thanks, Greg London
- [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Greg London
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Ronald J Kimball
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Greg London
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Sean Quinlan
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Greg London
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash j proctor
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash j proctor
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Greg London
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Daniel R. Allen
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Chris Devers
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Ronald J Kimball
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash John Tobey
- Re: [Boston.pm] pos on string in hash Dan Sugalski
