On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, James Eshelman wrote: > 1. Is there a better scheme?
Subclass the module with e.g. Net::Telnet::Dynamic (or something to that effect)? This avoids having to mess around with N::T, for people that depend on the current behavior. Alternatively, extend the module itself with some sort of dynamic_timeout parameter that defaults to 'off'? -- Chris Devers "Okay, Gene... so, -1 x -1 should equal what?" "A South American!" [....] "no human can understand the Timecube" and Gene responded without missing a beat "Yeah. I'm not human."
