On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:50:45PM -0500, Joel Gwynn wrote: > and this, of course, screws up html emails and mime-types. What's the > easiest way to forward the email with all the mime types intact? If I can > get away with it, I'd rather store the entire body in one field, and deal > with attachments, etc. later, rather than having a separate table for > attachments.
Funny you should ask. I was just reading rfcs 2045 and 2046. The easiest way is to send the message embedded as mime type message/rfc822. You may omit the headers of the original message if you wish, but you'll still need a blink line to mark the separation. -Gyepi _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
