> Here's another one: future proofing. The two or three character TLD > constraint you see today isn't necessary, and maybe in the future we'll > see longer addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Or Rendezvous > might catch on, and addresses of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] might become > common in some contexts.
Really, I'm only concerned with the present for the moment. As long as TLDs have more than two letters, and CCs all have two letters, that would be enough for me, except that how do I determine the difference between the CNAME/DOMAIN/TLD? > You probably don't want to have to keep tweaking your code here. Darren's > right -- this is too much of a pain to bother with hand-rolling; offload > the work to a CPAN module and update it as needed. As I said, it's not an option. > If you're hell bent on doing this yourself, I'm sure the relevant RFCs > would be a good source of answers. I think rfc822 is the main mail one > relevant to your needs, but someone may correct me on that... Yeah, it appears that's my only real option. I was hoping that this wouldn't have been such a nightmare. Thanks, Grant M. _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
