-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* David Cantrell <david at cantrell.org.uk> [2003-07-01 14:43]:
> On Tuesday, July 1, 2003 9:03 -0400 Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >From: David Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>It's a question of what you're used to, I guess.  IMO emacs's
> >>indentation blows syphilitic goats :-)
> >What exactly is wrong with emacs's auto-indent?
> 
> It does what - IMO - is the wrong thing.  I want a consistent amount
> of indentation from one level of nesting to the next.  Every emacs
> installation I've tried to use, including "fresh out of the box" ones,
> didn't do that.  Instead, it imposes what seem to me to be arbitrary
> amounts of extraneous whitespace.  20 characters here, 40 there, and
> so on.

My complaint with emacs' indenting isn't that it's the wrong amount but
that by default it mixes tab and space characters, which are not the
same thing.

> Maybe someone swapped it for a python editor without telling me ;-)

If that were the case, it would have to indent exactly the correct
amount of whitespace for every indent level, which is actually what you
said you wanted.  Anything else is a syntax error.

(darren)

- -- 
I can't understand why a person will take a year or two to write a
novel when he can easily buy one for a few dollars.
    -- Fred Allen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/AuFIzsinjrVhZaoRAoowAJ4mebSQdMAnuJ6/i2Wm8zdOP/K2kgCfQovA
cfVAR+80O6VFPUU9BbfTgI0=
=6VZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

Reply via email to