On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 12:29, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:53:12AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Sean Quinlan wrote: > > > > > Actually looking at my last few posts to this lists, it looks like the > > > actual signature portion is getting stripped out? > > > > Yep. > > > > This kind of thing is why no one signs list mail :-)
I'll try to remember to not sign list posts - but no promises. > Although I'm also skeptical of the utility of signing messages to mailing > lists, it wasn't actually intentional that signatures be stripped. I just sign all my email by default. The only time I'd think it might be of real use on a list is for verifying attachments. Use of encryption is something I like to advocate though, if only in a small way by actually using it myself. > :) > I've added application/pgp-signature to the list of allowed attachment > types. Thanks! -- Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
