On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:17:32PM -0400, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 09:34:15PM -0700, Ranga Nathan wrote: > > > Ronald, Could we please set the Reply-To: to the mailing list address > > please, pretty please? > > There are arguments on both sides of this issue, and we have tried both > approaches on this list. It is impossible to satisfy everybody, and we've > found in the past that the current approach works better for this list. I > have no plans to change this setting. Thank you for your understanding.
For what it's worth, NY.pm had this argument years ago, and the one thing I figured out is that, when it comes up YET AGAIN, I should just say "we had this argument *years ago* and this is how it was decided. I'm not changing it just so we can argue it some more." YMMV. :-) dha -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ If you're trying to confuse me, I can assure you it's unnecessary. ;-) - Larry Wall _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
