On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have you ever noticed a google resultset entry that didn't have a > cache link? I don't know if it is something that a publisher can set > programatically or if it is a business arrangement.
Pages are cached by default. To get removed you have to request it. http://www.google.com/help/features.html#cached > Advertising based news sites will probably be even less appreciative > of mirroring and caching as more and more of them turn into > registration based sites. You misunderstand. If registration is required, a crawler will fail anyway, and I don't mean anything but crawler-like behavior with depth 1. I'm talking about common sense caching, not "how can we defeat this site so all their content is mirrored." You could even have a redirect link that sends you to the cached version iff the original site is unresponsive, so normal users never know what happened. Ted _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
