Bob Rogers wrote: > ...they could mandate use of "use Enterprise" or whatever its called. > > Or maybe Perl::Critic [3] ?
Yes, in theory the 'use criticism'[1] pragma is the same idea. But I'm sure people comparing Perl + 'use criticism' to other moire restrictive languages would be quick to point out that 'use criticism' imposes a lot of overhead and isn't recommend for use in production, and that it isn't just one standard - how 'use criticism' behaves is dependent on one of 5 possible arguments and your .perlcriticrc file. More generally, Perl::Critic can be customized to enforce any rule. Such flexibility seems to be just what the critics of Perl don't want. -Tom 1. http://search.cpan.org/~thaljef/criticism-0.03/lib/criticism.pm -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
