At 12:09 PM 3/20/2007 -0400, Dan Boger wrote: >Of course, with the quality of HTML in the wild, it might be >difficult to get it loaded into an XML parser...
Which is another good reason for hand parsing routines. If dealing with WF XML (of which XHTML is a presentation oriented vocabulary), any old SAX/DOM parser will do. This is a good thing. Most docs purporting to be XHTML are not WF! The whole point of XML, imo, is to standardize the syntax to allow app developers to focus on the actual vocabulary or semantics. In any case, waste as few cycles (of the human brain variety) as possible on the syntax (quotes, angle brackets, etc.). It doesn't bear thinking about. take it easy, Charlie _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
