On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:29:06AM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > >>>>> "BT" == Ben Tilly <[email protected]> writes: > > besides, emacs has a vi mode (several i think) but does vi(m) have an > emacs mode? case settled! > > uri
That would (if true) definitely settle it. Programmers given only emacs are more desperate to escape to (their personal definition of) sanity than programmers given only vi(m). _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
