On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:55, Tom Metro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Steve Scaffidi wrote:
> > First, I read this here: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=304883
>
> Yup, that's pretty much the definitive reference on this "feature."
>
All this nonsense when perl presumably has everything it needs to
support actually naming the thing syntactically,
my $foo = sub foo { ... };
Anyone know if there's some philosophical/technical reason not to have
this in the language? (Not to be able to call it by name, just name
it)
Paul
_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
