I had replied earlier to James Eshelman's
note, and my copy to the Boston PM list bounced.
I am trying again from a different email agent.

>Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:23:51 -0400
>To: "James Eshelman" <[email protected]>
>From: William Whalen 
>Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Apache/mod_perl 2 => 1?
>Cc: 
>
>At 10:14 AM 6/18/2011 -0400, James Eshelman wrote:
>>A while back I worked with a big perl app running under mod_perl and apache2, 
>>but actually running in version 1 mode.  The problem is that the details of 
>>how this was accomplished are a bit sketchy in my  mind.  Apache2::compat was 
>>definitely part of it and is well documented on the mod perl site, but I have 
>>this nagging feeling that there was more to it than that and what I find on 
>>the mod_perl site.   Anyone have any pointers on doing this?   
>
>It sounds like you are migrating an existing mod_perl 1 application
>to mod_perl 2.  
>
>For mostly good reasons, the interface and conventions changed
>greatly from version one to two of mod_perl, and the migration takes a bit
>of revising.   Apache2::compat may make the earlier application
>function, at a potentially high run-time cost, and it is meant to
>be a temporary transition piece.
>
>You have found the on-line docs, which are not always
>easy to read but will repay attention.
>
>The mod_perl users list is a very good forum:
>
>http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
>
>This book is especially helpful (although the online
>material overlaps greatly and sometimes is more current):
>
>http://modperl2book.org/
>
>One can do a great deal with mod_perl, but it is
>rather its own entity.   
>
>William
>([email protected]) 


_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

Reply via email to