>>>>> "Greg" == Greg London <[email protected]> writes:
Greg> (A) You acknowlege that spam may get through your Bayesian spam filter Greg> (B) You acknowlege that said spam from (A) will generate blowback. Greg> (C) You give the appearance of realizing (A) and (B) are true, Greg> (D) and you give the appearance of having made the decision that Greg> (i) sending some blowback spam to someone else is better than Greg> (ii) getting spam in your own inbox. Greg> You solve your own problems by creating a potential new Greg> problem for everyone else. Greg> Assuming I understand what you've said about TMDA, Greg> I can see why this software generates such strong and Greg> visceral reactions in people. Hear hear. This is precisely why the anti-spam community is so violently opposed to TMDA-style solutions. Too Much Blowback. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
