On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 06:36:57AM -0700, Ben Tilly wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:02 AM, David Cantrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about abusing the pre-processor to build a strangely familiar-looking > > mini-language for testing ... > > > > int main(void) { > > int test_number = 0; > > int all_gone_buggerup = 0; > > OK(1 == 1, "it works!"); > > OK(2 == 1, "oh no it doesn't"); > > > > DONE_TESTING(); > > } > You missed the significant fact that I am passing information into the > description in further parameters. That's essential for me, not a > nice to have. It allows me to do things like have potentially dubious > values appear directly in my test output. (I caught a subtle bug due > to seeing that output just last night!)
You can write macros that have varargs, although I have a feeling that that might be a non-standard GNU extension. You may still end up with unreasonable amounts of punctuation, if you have to pass a format string etc. -- David Cantrell | top google result for "internet beard fetish club" There's no problem so complex that it can't be solved by killing everyone even remotely associated with it _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
