To be quite honest, Anatoly, I'm afraid you'll have to figure this stuff out for yourself. If you want to contribute, that's great, but you'll have to spend a lot of time reading code and playing with it, as with any other project. If somebody else has enough time to hold your hand and walk you through the whole process then you're in luck, but I'm afraid that person isn't me. :-)
If you have specific questions about e.g. a particular block of code or a particular function, feel free to ask, but if you're looking for a complete explanation of all of the inner workings of bpython then I definitely can't help you. We know bpython isn't a great piece of code, but we're all very happy with the end result, and so are all of our users. If you want to improve on it then please do feel free, but understand that your vision of the software may not match ours. Best of luck, On 9 April 2011 07:59, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Seems like guys are pretty busy. =) > > Still the code seems too interwined to me. Is it possible to run > bpython without any extra UI stuff? I want to start bpython in > standard console/terminal first and then see what functions are > missing to make its core features work. If there are some essential > upfront features that should be available in console/terminal just to > start bpython REPL, I'd like to know about it too. > > I'd like to see UI configurable so that there is a single entrypoint > in bpython that gives all necessary information about detected UI, > chosen UI, features enabled, features disabled and the reasons why > these features disables (TODO or UI limitations). I this could speed > up porting bpython to other UIs. > -- > anatoly t. > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Bob Farrell > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> We've actually got bpython working under Windows with bpython-gtk. It >> needs some polishing, but as a proof of concept it's definitely >> working. Any help you'd like to offer would be more than welcome. I >> haven't done any work on it personally but I think both Simon and >> Andreas have, so hopefully they will respond with more info. :-) >> >> On 7 April 2011 18:35, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I'd like to make bpython working on Windows. Is it possible to define some >>> parts that can be ported one by one? Maybe somebody can outline how bpython >>> works? I'd like to start with simple interface that doesn't contain any >>> bpython features and then add them one by one. Is that workflow possible >>> with current state of things, and if not - why? >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "bpython" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en. >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bpython" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
