On 2014-05-23 21:29:26, Mike wrote: > > > > I'm also looking at moving us off of bitbucket and onto github... > > > > See "tragedy of the commons". > > I understand that people like github. But for choice to survive, and for > the (superior in a few ways) platforms of bitbucket and mercurial to > prosper and remain viable, we can't have every product running over there.
The impotant thing is to move away from mercurial. It's fairly safe to say that nobody commiting code to bpython is enjoying mercurial anymore. The initial bunch of commits for curtsies support has been merged from a git repository. All the things I've commited in the last year or so were commited and pushed via git-remote-hg. But this is a work around and I really want to have a native git repository. I don't care much if the git repo lives on github or bitbucket. Both of them are annoying in one way or another. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
