Hi Stacey,
  I'm not Jim, but I can answer your question.  I usually find it takes about 3 
and a half minutes to download 100 emails.  Tonight I had 259 messages and it 
took just under 10 minutes.  My older VN probably would have taken 15 minutes 
to perform the same task.
David

> ----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stacey Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Braillenote List" <[email protected]
>Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 13:44:06 -0500
>Subject: Re: [Braillenote] My M-power Observations thus far

>Jim,
>If you have any kind of dial up access, could you try downloading email with
>that and see how long it takes?
>We don't have wireless yet.
>Stacey and Amigo

>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "James Aldrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[email protected]
>Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 12:35 PM
>Subject: [Braillenote] My M-power Observations thus far


>> Hello all,

>> Here are my M-power observations since I received it on Friday, September
>2nd.  I'm writing this with the M-power so anyone wishing to evaluate how
>this EMAIL may look once it reaches the list can feel free to analyze how
>well this works as they wish.  Just don't analyze my poor writing (grin
>smile)! I hope what I say will ease some of the concerns about this product
>on this list.

>> My wife Dar thought the M-power was lighter when she first saw it out of
>the box.  We both were impressed with the newer braille display.  The
>intensity of how the dots come up can be adjusted in the braille display
>menu.  I haven't seen much difference in the settings of the display so I
>keep it on the default of 5.  One can hardly tell whether the display is
>functioning or not.  One doesn't notice the thump thump on this newer
>display as the dots change position as one does with the older displays.  Of
>course, new is always better than the old but this truly is a sharp display.
>It is a pleasure to read with it.  It is a far better display than the
>immediate competition, there is no contest! The M-power display may not have
>the wear and tear of the older displays because of its smooth operation but
>time will tell.

>> I think the speech is clearer perhaps better pronunciation.  The speech
>voice is much the same as it was but I think the M-power  speaks more
>clearly.  It may or may not make a difference to anyone depending on hearing
>loss.  I'm more pleased with the speech on my M-power than my 32 BT even
>though I still say the speech on my older unit is quite good! Ear buds and
>headphones work so much better on the M-power.  One doesn't need to
>drastically set the volume higher for headphones.  I rarely set the volume
>between the speaker and headphones with the M-power.

>> I charged the battery twice since I received this unit.  The battery gage
>went to a hundred percent both times and stayed at a hundred percent once I
>disconnected the AC adapter.  It went down to 99 percent soon after the
>charger was disconnected and the battery seems to last quite a while between
>charges thus far.  On the second time of charging, I noticed that the gage
>was at 94 percent after two hours.  I left the M Power plugged in much
>longer and once I got home from church, it was at 96 percent.  The
>percentage was the same when I disconnected the adapter.  I kept it plugged
>in till the gage reached 100 percent.  I think the gage may have calibrated
>this time around which accounted for how long the battery took to charge.  I
>didn't get much notice once the battery reached zero percent.  I'll know
>more in time about the battery life but I'm not complaining thus far.

>> Kathy Williams take note! I downloaded 133 messages with both BN units.  I
>left the messages on the server.  The BN 32 BT took 6 minutes and 16.6
>seconds according to the M-power stopwatch to download all 133 messages.
>The M-power took 2 minutes 7.18 seconds according to the BN BT stopwatch to
>download the same mail.  Emptying the trash and clearing database space is a
>snap! One barely has a chance to breathe and the process is done! This unit
>is quick! I'm keeping messages on the server for a while longer so I hope to
>update you on how much quicker the M-power is than my older BN BT.  Of
>course, one must consider the limited disk space and the processor speed
>when comparing the two units ability to download EMAIL.  I like the way the
>M-power turns wireless on automatically when one wishes to go on the web or
>download EMAIL.  One still must turn wireless off after being on the web or
>downloading EMAIL.  I neglected to say I'm on a wireless DSL connection here
>..

>> Being able to listen to streaming audio on a portable device is truly
>nice! I would say the M-power works well on the "free streams".  ACB Radio
>was the first stream I tried.  It was a snap to get to and listen.  I also
>listened to a MONTANA Radio Station stream, and some other streams on Bill
>Sparks dot com as well as radio-locator dot com.  I tried to get into the XM
>Radio site, listen at XM Radio dot com.  I got into their web site okay but
>when I tried to receive a stream, I was told by their site in no uncertain
>terms that I needed to update my web browzer since my present browzer
>couldn't support the new features in their player.  I got such a kick out of
>what I heard, I tried it again! One can get their site as I described it
>above and one must write it together, or one can go to wwwddxmradioddcom and
>select "listen now".  One can get a three day trial on their programming
>otherwise one pays $7 a month to get the stream or close to $14 a month if
>one has one of their receivers.
>>   WSM Radio is another site which became a "pay site" so doubt it is
>available to the M-power.  This is why I say the M-power probably works best
>on the "free streams".

>> Passing files from my PC to the M-power is so much faster now through the
>network.  I was able to get both MP3 and wav files to my M-power and play
>them with no difficulty.  I was pleasantly surprised to find how quickly I
>was able to copy these files and play them with no difficulty whatsoever.  I
>may have found one file that wouldn't play but it wouldn't play on my PC
>either.  The playback on the wav file player is very good.  I'll have more
>to say about it later.  I went to Voice of the Nation's Blind dot org to
>listen to a particular file.  I could hear one file from that site with no
>problem but I couldn't hear the file I wished to listen to.  I kept hearing
>something about unfamiliar media so couldn't hear what I wanted to hear.
>This morning, I was able to hear the introduction of the May Humanware
>Newsletter on the humanware site.  I'll listen to more of it when I have
>time.  I can see that I have a wonderful world of streaming audio waiting
>for me when I wish to hear new info
>> rmation or music.  I'm looking forward to being a part of this new world
>with my M-power.

>> The most disappointing feature to me on the M-power is the Memo Recorder.
>Perhaps I don't understand digital recording very well! This is the first
>digital recorder I have used at length.  The memo recorder plays back wav
>files very nicely provided they were recorded or created elsewhere.  Based
>on how my unit operates, this memo recorder is good for voice only whether
>it is on the low quality settings or the high quality settings.  One can
>record their audio memos if they aren't too far from the microphone.  One
>doesn't have to hold the M-power or external microphone to their face
>though.  The default factory setting for recording with the internal
>microphone is level 12.  When I attempt to record at this setting, my
>recording is faint and the recording is weak with a fuzzy distorted sound as
>if I were talking through wax paper.  The speech is not intelligible and the
>speech is intermittent! Level ten seems to give me the best recording
>quality but I hear a degree of white noise and
>>  a slight frying sound in the background of my recording.  Speech from the
>notetaker comes in very well for obvious reasons if I happen to leave my
>unit in record and attempt to operate other functions with my M-power.  The
>memo recorder in my unit is adequate for memos and I might send voice
>attachments in an EMAIL or two, but I don't think it would record music very
>well especially that piano recital.  There are other devices on the market
>which would better serve such a purpose.  I think a $20 to $40 cassette
>recorder could do as well or better for a recital than would my particular
>M-power unit.  There might be some kind of component breakdown inhibiting my
>unit from recording properly, I really don't know! To my knowledge, the memo
>recorder isn't stereo either.  I could be wrong about this conclusion
>though.  I can safely say my unit doesn't support levels 11 through 15 with
>the internal microphone.  I placed the level with an external microphone to
>35.  I couldn't hear anything
>> at all from that attempt to record.  I could hear the external microphone
>when I set the record level to a lower setting.  I may need to check the
>battery in the microphone perhaps.  The playback is fine with my memo
>recorder but I question whether the record feature is working properly in my
>unit.  I'll be happy to send anyone interested attachments when recording at
>level 10, 11 and 12.  This should show what I'm talking about.

>> Web braille seems to be working better on the M-power.  I can now reach
>the listing of braille books at the end of the web page.  I can again get
>into the list to download volumes once again.  My older BN BT was able to
>get that page as well so maybe NLS fixed the problem, I really don't know! I
>haven't downloaded any books lately so that is for another EMAIL.

>> I haven't interfaced my M-power with my Juliet braille embosser but I hope
>to accomplish that soon! I haven't tried the bluetooth feature so that is
>something I'll look forward to.

>> I'll be happy to try web sites when I can to see how accessible they will
>be for the M-power if that would be helpful to anyone.

>> As I wrote this EMAIL, I noticed the speech cut out for no apparent
>reason.  I turned the speech to on request to off and back on again and
>everything was fine.  This happened three times while I wrote this post.

>> Thanks for reading!

>> Jim Aldrich

>> ___
>> To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>> http://list.humanware.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



>___
>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>http://list.humanware.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote


Reply via email to