Yup, Maria, if you saw my other post (I'm not sure if you have replied to it 
because I am still plowing through the mail in my Inbox), then I did say that's 
definitely a good thing.  I think that getting the latest Keysoft version burnt 
in as an extra service on your BN, covered by the PMA, is harmless.  Sending 
the unit just for that is a little overkill, <grin>.
Of course I don't mind if you (or anyone else) state your opinion.  Anyone can 
do that, and I expect that anyone else will also let me do that without 
thinking that I'm out to offend or embarrass them.  For a 15-year-old, you seem 
to be more mature than other people.  Thank the Maker for that.

Roselle

>----- QUOTED MESSAGE -----
>Sent by: Maria Kristic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>Hi Roselle,
>The reason why KeySoft 5 was burnt into ROM for me was because this was done 
>when my BrailleNote was sent for repair in December.  I was told that every 
>time the unit was sent for servicing, if you had a Flash Disk upgrade, the 
>latest version of KeySoft would be burnt into ROM.  When I sent my unit in for 
>repair, the burning was covered under the warranty.  I think it would also be 
>covered by the Service Contract, because repairing would count as servicing, 
>wouldn't it? I see what you're saying, and I probably wouldn't have had it 
>burnt into ROM had it not been done for me in December.  However, if it's 
>covered in Service Contracts (I'm not sure it is), I wouldn't mind having it 
>done.  Just my opinion.  Hope you don't mind.  Also, does the upgrade cost 
>$95? Someone told me it cost $200, so it's kind of a relief for me to find out 
>it costs half of what I thought it did.  However, you're right in thinking 
>that $95 can buy you some memory cards.  I think the reason it's so expe
 nsive is that it's not really mass produced like mainstream software, but it 
is still a lot of money when you think of it in terms of mainstream 
applications.  Just a thought.
>Maria

>> ----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Roselle Ambubuyog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: Braillenote List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Date: Tue,  2 Mar 2004 12:06:10 +0800 (PHT)
>>Subject: ROM version Re: Virus on Keysoft? Re: [Braillenote] wav files to mp3

>>Oh sure, save 1.5 MB which you will again lose when an upgrade comes along 
>>that would install additional files.  And then what? Send in your unit to 
>>have the latest upgrade burnt in once more? And pay US$95.00, not to mention 
>>the shipping expense? With that amount, I can already get a 512 MB cf card, 
>>or a 256 and a 128 MB card.
>>Also, I don't believe that Maria's experience with Keyweb performing better 
>>on some sites has anything to do with having 5.0 burnt in.  She was just 
>>lucky the subsequent times she tried it maybe.  I'm able to access some https 
>>sites even with just 3.07 burnt in.  The improvement in Keyweb performance 
>>depends on space in the Keysoft Systems Disk, not the Flash Disk.  If there's 
>>any site that's not accessible, it's due to the limitation of IE 4 used with 
>>Keyweb and JavaScripts.  PDI themselves said there's no significant 
>>improvement in Keyweb with 5.0, and you bet there isn't because otherwise, we 
>>wouldn't have seen the posted complaints about no Keymail and Keyweb 
>>enhancements when 5.0 was released.

>>I'm not discouraging people to have 5.0 burnt in, but I hope we don't 
>>disillusion them with things that do not really come with having 5.0 in ROM.

>>Roselle

>>>----- QUOTED MESSAGE -----
>>>Sent by: "John Gunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>>Hi Maria:

>>>The only thing I'd add to your post below is having Keysoft burned in to rom
>>>would save you roughly 1.5 megs of space on the flash disk since I think
>>>that's where build 24 is located but just an opinion.  smile


>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Maria Kristic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>To: "Braillenote List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:13 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Virus on Keysoft? Re: [Braillenote] wav files to mp3


>>>> Yes, KeySoft runs on Windows CE.  The only significant improvement I saw
>>>with burning into ROM was my improvement to some HTTPS sites, but that might
>>>have just been my case.  You'll probably find some other minor improvements
>>>that you would get that weren't there with the Flash Disk upgrade, but I
>>>can't really think of any right now.  I'm pretty sure the reason for this is
>>>that the Flash Disk upgrade you can download is KeySoft 5 Build 24, and the
>>>newest one you can get burnt into ROM right now is KeySoft 5 Build 25, which
>>>is slightly newer, and came out about 4 months after Build 24.  HTH.
>>>> Maria

>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: Josh Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>To: Braillenote List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:48:39 -0500
>>>>>Subject: Re: Virus on Keysoft? Re: [Braillenote] wav files to mp3

>>>>>but doesn't keysoft run on windows ce? Also, if I would have keysoft
>>>burnt
>>>>>into rom, would I notice a difference in how it behaves? in things such
>>>as
>>>>>the web browser, keyword, etc?

>>>>>Josh


>>>>>___
>>>>>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>>>>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



>>>> ___
>>>> To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>>> http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



>>>___
>>>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote




>>___
>>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



>___
>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote




Reply via email to