Hi. I can understand if bookmarks only work with keyword documents. We do the same in kurzweil 1000. I jus think it would be neat if we could have more than 26.
At 1/29/2004, you wrote:

Hey Paul,
I also think that the bookmarks should work with all documents, not just documents in keyword. I was thinking about marking some parts of a book I was reading in whatever web braille is in, and ks would not let me do it.

> ----- Original Message -----
>From: Paul Henrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Braillenote List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:20:52 -0800
>Subject: Re: [Braillenote] wireless cards for BNQT

>Hi, Terry.  I like your suggestions.  I especially like the one about
>numbered bookmarks. We could indeed have 100 or maybe even more. That would
>be great.
>At 1/27/2004, you wrote:

>>I agree with what you said.  I'd rather use KeyWord than my PC to create
>>documents because it's designed to meet my needs using my strengths.

>>I believe there are some improvements which could be made to KeyWord so we
>>could do more things with it:

>>1.  the ability to change case

>>2.  the ability to see page numbers displayed

>>3.  the support for translating bold and underlining using the 4-6 dots
>>instead of the code

>>4.  the ability to import and export .dxp and .dxb files

>>5.  the ability to save documents in true MS Word, not rich text format

>>6.  the ability to create true outlines

>>7.  the ability to create running headers or footers

>>8.  the ability to tell my printer I want to print something from the top
>>tray instead of the bottom one

>>9.  one-inch margins all around

>>10. numbered bookmarks instead of letters, so we could create 100 bookmarks

>>11.  the ability to create flush right with leader dots

>>12.  the ability to create footnotes.

>>When I need to use any of these specific tools, then I must go to my PC and
>>use another word processor.  I usually end up using Duxbury, because it's
>>the most user-friendly word processor I've got in this thing. I've been too
>>afraid to buy either Word or WordPerfect because I'm not sure how well I
>>would get along with either of them using a screen reader.  WP was my
>>favorite word processor in the DOS days, but it doesn't seem to be supported >>by screen readers as well as Word is and I hate to think of paying the steep
>>price for Word.

>>Another thing I would like to see is a good template for addressing an
>>envelope, the kind used for business letters, which has the return address
>>at the top left-hand corner.  I haven't been successful in modifying the
>>envelope template to include the return address.  If someone has succeeded
>>in doing this and prints envelopes using the BN, please let me know.

>>I don't expect the BN to ever take the place of my PC.  My PC can probably
>>handle email and web pages faster than the BN but I haven't tested keyweb ye
>>t.  My past experiences with keymail have been disappointing but perhaps it
>>has been improved in version 5.  When I get time, I'll have to see.

>>It's a mistake to believe the BN will take the place of a PC or that a PC
>>can take the place of the BN.  It's not realistic.

>>Terri, Amateur radio call sign KF6CA.  Army MARS call sign AAT9PX,
>>California
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Ann Parsons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: "Braillenote List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:06 AM
>>Subject: re: [Braillenote] wireless cards for BNQT


>>> Hi all,

>>> I realize that some may disagree with me, but perhaps some further
>>> discussion about philosophy is in order here.  I have used products
>>> which came of both the blindness and the sighted philosophy.  Let me
>>> explain.

>>> A device which is designed for the blind in mind, as Jonathan says, is
>>> one which takes our blindness into consideration and expands upon our
>>> strengths so that we get a product or device that is made for us, not
>>> a device which is made for the sighted and then retrofit to suit the
>>> needs of the blind.

>>> There is, for example, a wonderful voice output system for Linux
>>> called Emacspeak.  It makes no bones about the fact that it is
>>> designed with the blind user in mind.  It is not graphical.  It is
>>> text based.  It is command driven.  It is usercentric.  Its creator
>>> T.V.  Raman says that if you take away the Emacspeak desktop, it
>>> renders the user powerless.  Here is his exact quote.

>>> "Independent test results have proven that unlike some modern
>>> software, Emacspeak can be safely uninstalled without adversely
>>> affecting the continued performance of the computer.  These same
>>> tests also revealed that once uninstalled, the user stopped
>>> functioning altogether."

>>> Seems to me that PDI has that same philosophy.  From everything I've
>>> read on the list here, those of you who have been without your BN's
>>> stop functioning.

>>> Now, I have also used and am using Windows, an OS which has been
>>> adapted for blind users.  It works well enough, but it is a patch-up
>>> job, a fix, if you will.  Screen readers are designed to allow the
>>> user to access everything which the sighted do, but the user must do
>>> so in the same way as do the sighted.  There is no provision made for
>>> our strengths.  We must bend.  We must integrate.  We must make the
>>> graphical interface understandable to non-seeing imagination.  Yes, it
>>> works.  Yes, you can use off-the-shelf software, but you are not as
>>> efficient because you have an entire layer of tasks you must complete
>>> before you can accomplish anything.

>>> Frankly, if I can access the same materials as my sighted peers and in
>>> the same efficient way without worrying about interacting with a
>>> graphical environment, then I'm all for it!  Give me something that
>>> works for me as a blind person, not something somebody cobbled
>>> together so that I could access something.  It's called universal
>>> design folks, universal design!

>>> If the BN had USB and Wireless connectivity, and if they added FTP and
>>> Telnet, then I'd be a totally happy camper.

>>> Ann P.

>>> --
>>> Ann K.  Parsons
>>> email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> WEB SITE:  http://home.eznet.net/~akp
>>> "All that is gold does not glitter.
>>> Not all those who wander are lost."  JRRT


>>> ___
>>> To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>> http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



>>___
>>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote

>Paul Henrichsen
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]
><home.pacbell.net/paulh52



>___
>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote




___
To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote

Paul Henrichsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<home.pacbell.net/paulh52>



Reply via email to