I must admit, I hope the current hardware lasts a little longer anyway. I
just sent mine off to be upgraded. Granted, I could have done it sooner, but
the upgrade was a pretty penny, and I would not be happy if it fell behind
again right away.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Braillenote List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Braillenote] Future of BrailleNote hardware


> Hi Doug. Thanks for your very well worded and constructive suggestions.
> I've also read all the replies to your message. The first thing I'd say is
> that none of your requests is unreasonable in the slightest. It's
important
> to note however that products like the BrailleNote sell for more than do
> the equivalent in the sighted world. Part of this is due to the technology
> involved. Braille display technology is still tricky to manufacture. Part
> of the price is also do to volume. A particular version of iPaq for
example
> will have a massive production run, and economies of scale mean that this
> keeps the price lower. Couple this with the fact that many blind people
are
> without employment and/or rely on external funding to obtain their
> technology, and we at HumanWare are strongly compelled to give as much
> value for money as possible. For example, I sat down with the software
> engineers early last year and they did a lot of work on whether or not we
> could offer an operating system upgrade with all its benefits on the
> current hardware. Indeed, many people speculated on this list that we
would
> never do wireless until we offered new hardware. I think it's a moral
issue
> that we at HumanWare genuinely give you all we can from the current
> hardware before we introduce a replacement for it. Now I think that given
> what we've achieved, people will accept that we've really done right by
our
> customers. But obviously no hardware lasts forever. We appreciate that
> technology evolves, and we will of course respond to that evolution. But I
> know that those who struggle even to find $399 to upgrade to KeySoft 6.11
> have appreciated us giving them all we can with the hardware they have.
>
> Jonathan Mosen
> BrailleNote Product Marketing Manager
> HumanWare
>
> DDI: +64-3-373-6192
> Fax:  +64-3-384 4933
> Mobile: +64-21 466 736
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.humanware.com
>
>
>
>              "Doug Lawlor"
>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>              d.net>                                                     To
>              Sent by:                  "'Braillenote List'"
>              braillenote-bounc         <[email protected]>
>              [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          cc
>              .com
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        [Braillenote] Future of BrailleNote
>              04/06/2005 01:00          hardware
>              a.m.
>
>
>              Please respond to
>              Braillenote List
>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>               .pulsedata.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello list, Although I am sure in the coming months we will see some
> exciting software upgrades for the BrailleNote family of products I feel I
> must express my concern on the lack of modern day hardware for the
> BrailleNote/VoiceNote family. I would welcome comments from all users on
> this subject. I would like to note although I talk about software
> development I am not a developer so comments from software developers
would
> be welcome. I feel if I am going to use this platform as a business tool
in
> coming years it is necessary for me to make my views known on the
> limitations of the current hardware as I see it. Therefore, I am putting
my
> comments on this list so we can hopefully establish some dialog on this
> topic. Before I point out the negatives with this unit I would like to
> mention some of the positive points these units have to offer.
>
> 1. The BrailleNote has a good clean simple interface. It is nice to be
able
> to work with the same type of menu structure regardless of the application
> you are in.
>
> 2. Braille support is consistent throughout the suite of applications.
>
> 3. The Braille display is very good. I do not have any complaints here.
>
> 4. Good battery life. It is nice to be able to charge this unit up and
have
> enough power for a week of usage. No extra batteries are necessary. This
is
>
> a good thing.
>
> 5. I like the ability to be able to turn the unit off and still be in the
> last application used when the unit is powered back up. This is very good.
>
> 6. I like the idea of having a 32 cell Braille display in a compact unit
> that can fit into a book bag or briefcase.
>
> Now I would like to talk about the problems I see with the current
hardware
> configuration as it stands now.
>
> 1. There is No USB connection. if a user wishes to connect the BrailleNote
> family to a modern day laptop it is necessary to use bulky USB to Serial
> adapters to make this happen. The main problem with serial connections is
> that they are very slow and not suited for transferring large files in the
> multimegabyte size. My current dell laptop does not have a serial port
> built
> in making this task a cumbersome process for when one wants to use the
> Braille display of the BrailleNote or transfer a file from the unit. Yes,
I
> know a flash card reader will solve the latter problem and I do have one
of
> these.
>
> 2. No blue Tooth connection. If one wishes to run the excellent
BrailleNote
> GPS product from Sendero group it is necessary to carry an extra battery
> box
> containing a serial to USB adapter for the EarthMate GPS receiver. If the
> BrailleNote family could support Bluetooth the user could do away with the
> extra battery/cable kit and just carry a compact Bluetooth receiver. The
> Bluetooth connection could also be used for use of the Braille display on
> the PC.
>
> 3. No modern day processor - As I understand it the BrailleNote family
> currently runs on the MIPS platform at 133 MHZ. I can see this presenting
> problems for developers who wish to develop software to run both on the
> BrailleNote Family (MIPS) and the new PK (XScale). If Humanware's goal is
> to
> have third party developers write software for there products it would
make
> much more sense to have both products running on the same or similar
> hardware platform. This is currently not the case. Why should developers
> have to deal with two platforms and maintain two code bases to write
> software for a very small number of users? How difficult will it be for
> Humanware to have a trained support team to deal with each platform? This
> in
> the long run is going to drive up the cost of development. The main goal
> should be to bring the cost of software development for these devices
down.
> Given the current hardware state of this product I do not see this
> happening
> anytime soon.
>
> 4. The BrailleNote family currently has no way to input and output stereo
> audio. The ability to input and output stereo audio would make it possible
> for truly accessible recording software to be written giving the blind
user
> a truly accessible digital recorder. I don't know of any hardware based
> digital recorder which will allow the blind user to do basic things such
as
> set and read input levels or see how much time or space is left on a
> flashcard. Voice over IP is another issue. Given the fact that it is
> possible to have voice over IP applications such as Skype run on handheld
> pocket pc devices I feel this will become an important issue as Voice over
> IP becomes more prevalent in the work place. Devices like the BrailleNote,
> given the right hardware and software, could really shine in these areas.
> My
> use of Skype on the Pc, even with scripts for my screen reader, has not
> been
> the most straight forward experience.
>
> 5. The current serial and parallel ports should be done away with. Given
> the
> fact that most of the current crop of laptop computers do not come with
> these ports indicates that the market is not looking for such legacy
> hardware anymore. We would be much better off if we could connect to
modern
> day USB printers. hard discs, audio devices, barcode scanners, and the
list
> goes on.
>
> I look forward to people's comments on the future of this product. I feel
> the BrailleNote could have a lot more potential if resources were directed
> to the above areas of improvement.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> ___
> To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
> http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
>
>
>
>
> ___
> To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
> http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
>

Reply via email to