Having just dug a little deeper it would appear the EAX5 does come with a 
brass outlet, so that isn’t a concern, but I did notice that the EAX5 pumps 
I was seeing did not have the NSF mark, not sure if that means it’s 
actually much different or if it just wasn’t certified. Either way I don’t 
think a 1/1.5 duty cycle is good enough for espresso use.

On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 8:42:55 PM UTC-4 Brian wrote:

>
>    1. With ulka vibratory pumps the E series is the high pressure series. 
>    5 is the flow curve, so you should see nearly identical flow with each of 
>    those pumps. This can be seen on the Spec sheet for the E series pumps. 
>    
> <http://files.cemegroup.com/elettropompe/0/60/Scheda%20tecnica%20E%20high%20pressure.pdf?v=636869779789441307>
>  The 
>    biggest difference on all of these is the duty cycle, and the materials. 
>    The EAX pump is plastic, while the EX and EFX is brass. The duty cycle 
> (the 
>    amount of time it can run/the amount of time it needs to rest in minutes) 
>    is 1/1.5 for the EAX, 1/1for the EX (at 120VAC) and the EFX is 2/1 (same 
>    for the EX @220VAC). So basically the EAX is the least durable, while the 
>    EFX is the most durable. Unless you are considering something like flow 
>    profiling there is no reason to get the EFX over the EX, but the EAX is 
>    plastic with a much lower duty cycle, so should probably be avoided for 
>    this application.
>    
> On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 2:53:42 PM UTC-4 Ira wrote:
>
>> Hello jjk3,
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 3:45:15 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>> Just wanted to get some confirmation on using the Ulka EX5 vs EAX5 in my 
>> Brewtus II.  I currently have the EX5 (41 watts, duty cycle 1/1). Am I 
>> correct in that the EAX5 (52 watts, duty cycle 1/1.5) can also be used? 
>> Essentially any vibe pump will work. Some have internal diodes and some 
>> need an external diode and some flow slightly more than others. It's 
>> possible that different pumps will slightly affect the rate of rise of 
>> pressure at the start of the brew cycle, but that's about the only 
>> difference you might see. So, likely the least expensive solution that will 
>> fit is the best one.
>>
>> -- Ira
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Brewtus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/brewtus/104381ea-f69b-415a-b71b-594ad4467081n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to