>>>>> "SH" == Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SH> Someone had sent some patches to do PVST, but PVST seems to be SH> Cisco centric. and the patched version was too inflexible, so I SH> didn't put it in mainline. PVST is indeed Cisco centric. It is also the only way to stay sane if you have several VLAN's. However, isn't PVST the same as making a br100 out of eth0.100 and eth1.100, and turning STP on? Hopefully the STP packets should then emerge with a VLAN tag of 100. /Benny _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
