We use vtun which is a userland option, a little slow but offers rate-limiting and some other nice to have features.
When we require the lowest possible overhead option, we use the etherip kernel patches. Dylan On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:41 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Malcolm Scott wrote: > > At 21:02 today, c.j wrote: > > > >>> You can setup a tunnel with OpenVPN. You'd get a tap device on > >>> both sides which can be bridged with eth. > >> Thanks. But maybe we don't want OpenVPN for VPN. Now I can't get why kernel > >> do not support that. Have some disadvantages? > > > > I'm not sure if this is even possible using standard protocols. Bridging > > is > > for Ethernet; PPP is not Ethernet. So this would require some sort of > > nonstandard Ethernet-over-PPP encapsulation protocol, and would only make > see standard rfc3518, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3518.txt, I think there > is a (old?) patch flying around for this ... > > > _______________________________________________ > Bridge mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
_______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
